Messages

346

OD/WEK & JAVA API / Re: ODWEK 9.0/Server 10.1

« on: April 22, 2020, 08:52:51 AM »

There shouldn't be any big issue moving from ODWEK v9.0 to v9.5, as long as you stay at or below CMOD Fixpack v9.5.0.2.  Once you move to CMOD v9.5.0.3, the DocID's that are returned by ODWEK are encrypted, and that may cause a lot of problems.  At least v9.5 is on the compatibility matrix -- but you should be aware that Content Manager OnDemand 9.5 end of support is April 30th, 2020...  so about a week from now.

-JD.

347

Content Navigator / Re: How to support different time zones for multiple desktops on same ICN Server?

« on: April 22, 2020, 07:57:53 AM »

Maybe this could be fixed by more flexible default dates in the Admin client...  Like using the 't' parameter for t+1 (today plus one) and t-90 (90 days in the past).  Probably a good entry for the Enhancement forum. 

-JD.

348

OD/WEK & JAVA API / Re: Integeration with filenet

« on: April 21, 2020, 05:55:00 AM »

If you require ODWEK, then yes, because the OnDemand Web Enablement Kit Java API has been part of the Content Manager OnDemand server installation since CMOD 9.5.

-JD.

349

z/OS Server / Re: Partial Load ID not present in System Log or System Load

« on: April 20, 2020, 06:29:33 AM »

It *is* strange.  I know that ERM can reload data (to dispose of old files that aren't being held), and I know they get reloaded into the current segment table, but I don't know if they get new DocID's (I don't think they would).

Do you have any line of business apps that use the ODWEK Java API to insert documents into CMOD?  I know the Load function of the API creates a #87 message, but not about the add message...

-JD.

350

OD/WEK & JAVA API / Re: Integeration with filenet

« on: April 19, 2020, 01:17:38 PM »

ODWEK is included in the CMOD Server installation package.  Review the install and configuration instructions for ODWEK in the latest documentation.  ODWEK v9 won't work with v10.5.

-JD.

351

z/OS Server / Re: Partial Load ID not present in System Log or System Load

« on: April 17, 2020, 11:38:15 AM »

Any chance you're using the Enhanced Retention Management add-on?

-JD.

352

z/OS Server / Re: Partial Load ID not present in System Log or System Load

« on: April 17, 2020, 09:38:25 AM »

Maybe you need a wildcard character (%) at the end of the partial load id?

353

MP Server / Re: CMOD lifecycle link

« on: April 16, 2020, 01:25:56 PM »

There's a link to the Software Support Lifecycle page on the CMOD wiki here:  https://cmod.wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page#IBM_CMOD_Support_.26_CMOD_System_Requirements

And there's also a short-link that I keep up to date for tracking CMOD versions End of Life:  http://CMOD.co/eol

-JD.

354

MP Server / Re: ARSLOG for Users retrievals only

« on: April 14, 2020, 05:47:30 PM »

I'm glad I could help with your arslog question!  Take care.

-JD.

355

Other / Re: CMOD v10.5 Install(LDAP-vs-Local)

« on: April 14, 2020, 05:46:09 PM »

Hi Jack...

Can you give us a little more information?  What sort of questions are you looking for answers to?  What problems are you trying to prevent?  Is there any information you're getting from your identity management team that you're looking for help with?  What are you doing now, and how would you like to change / improve it?

Investing a little time and effort in your question will help us to help you!

-JD.

356

Content Navigator / Re: Issue in connecting repository in Navigator of CMODV10.5

« on: April 09, 2020, 08:09:23 AM »

The first line of the error message is complaining about this:

java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com.google.gson.JsonSyntaxException

So it sounds like you need to do some triple-checking to ensure the classpath is correct when-and-where ICN needs it.

-JD.

357

Content Navigator / Re: Issue in connecting repository in Navigator of CMODV10.5

« on: April 09, 2020, 06:55:17 AM »

What have you tried to do in order to fix it?  Did you follow the installation guide?  Have you re-checked your steps?  Did you check for requisite libraries/classes?

-JD.

358

MP Server / Re: ARSLOG for Users retrievals only

« on: April 08, 2020, 06:05:21 AM »

Yeah, this all depends on your level of paranoia.  At the end of the day, you need to trust someone to do the work.  Putting high levels of access-level security in place is a good start.  As much as I hate buzzwords, 'blockchain' is the solution to the problem of detecting attempts to alter log data.

The code I posted for you creates a log file name that includes the date on which it was created, so it should meet that requirement.

-JD.

359

z/OS Server / Re: Maximum application groups mapped to a folder?

« on: April 07, 2020, 10:23:45 AM »

You may have run into some internal architectural limits.  Many years ago, systems that had 80,000+ users were disappointed to know that UIDs and GID's were shared, causing problems.

-JD.

360

MP Server / Re: ARSLOG for Users retrievals only

« on: April 07, 2020, 10:21:58 AM »

You can put anything you'd like into the arslog script.  Scripts are usually written in a UNIX script language, so that it's fast to start up.  You can do anything with any of the variables you're passed, so if you have "ICN_USER" as a User ID, you can simply do an:

Code: [Select]

LOG_FILE=LogFileName-`date +%Y%m%d`
if [[ $4 == "ICN_USER" ]] ; then
   print "$8" >> $LOG_FILE
fi

But just an FYI - it's REALLY important that your code is *FAST*.  If you're going to call it hundreds of thousands of times a day, even if it takes half a second to run, it can severely disrupt your CMOD server.

Is there a reason you're not simply doing queries on your System Log the next day?  What exactly are you trying to accomplish with this?

-JD.