256
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
257
z/OS Server / Re: ARSYSPIN
« on: October 19, 2020, 12:06:56 PM »
Could you just load the sysouts into a CMOD Application Group, and let them access it that way? That way all of the diagnostic output would appear in one place, and could be archived for days/weeks/months/years?
-JD.
-JD.
258
Announcements & News / Re: z/OS Level 2 Support Changes - Hail and Farewell
« on: October 15, 2020, 08:58:28 AM »
Request received, and actioned! 
259
Documentation / Re: 10.5 Install Questions
« on: October 14, 2020, 01:05:34 PM »
If it's a new server, why are you trying to use a database from another server?
Can you describe the 'big picture' of what you're trying to achieve here?
-JD.
Can you describe the 'big picture' of what you're trying to achieve here?
-JD.
260
MP Server / Re: Verify Login Credentials
« on: October 14, 2020, 10:14:51 AM »
Heh. I've done worse! 
-JD.
-JD.
261
MP Server / Re: Verify Login Credentials
« on: October 13, 2020, 04:59:28 AM »
I suspect you need double braces [[ ]] around comparisons with the -ne operator. But I'm not sure which shell you're writing in, and they're all a little different and picky about that stuff.
-JD.
-JD.
262
Other / Re: Attachments on Documents ingested into CMOD
« on: October 09, 2020, 09:15:08 AM »
So, as I said, you could add another Application Group, or more Applications to an existing Application Group, and simply load the attachments in. The only tricky part is that you would need one Application for each document type for attachments - One for CSV, one for word, one for JPEG images, etc. etc.
Can you describe your use case a little more?
-JD.
Can you describe your use case a little more?
-JD.
263
Other / Re: Attachments on Documents ingested into CMOD
« on: October 09, 2020, 06:54:15 AM »
Attachment or an annotation?
CMOD doesn't support the idea of attachments, but you could build an Application that provided that functionality, if all of the attachments were the same format.
-JD.
CMOD doesn't support the idea of attachments, but you could build an Application that provided that functionality, if all of the attachments were the same format.
-JD.
264
OD/WEK & JAVA API / Re: Get total return count from a folder query without changing setting to unlimited
« on: October 07, 2020, 04:30:12 PM »
+1 for spond... This is the correct answer. I clearly need to start reading the CMOD ODWEK manuals some more.
-JD.
-JD.
265
Report Indexing / Re: PDF indexer (with PPD) - multi-document PDF, how to set unique title for docs
« on: October 06, 2020, 01:25:53 PM »
Sorry to go all the way back to the original post... But if you want the window (that a retrieved document is displayed in) to have a specific name related to the metadata, you can enable this checkbox:
Folder Window -> Field Information Tab -> Select the field name-> Defaults Pane-> View Title.
Check the online help in the Admin Client for more info.
-JD.
Folder Window -> Field Information Tab -> Select the field name-> Defaults Pane-> View Title.
Check the online help in the Admin Client for more info.
-JD.
266
Report Indexing / Re: PDF indexer (with PPD) - multi-document PDF, how to set unique title for docs
« on: October 05, 2020, 09:07:29 AM »
Since the CMOD PDF Indexer doesn't modify these fields, whichever tool that produces your PDFs would have to perform this change.
-JD.
-JD.
267
OD/WEK & JAVA API / Re: Get total return count from a folder query without changing setting to unlimited
« on: October 05, 2020, 09:06:10 AM »
The setting is there for a reason -- you don't want someone to be able to turn it off.
Best bet is to do the queries on the individual application groups yourself to get around the Folder limitations for regular users.
-JD.
Best bet is to do the queries on the individual application groups yourself to get around the Folder limitations for regular users.
-JD.
268
Windows Client / Re: Adding new accesses by multiple users
« on: September 29, 2020, 10:31:39 AM »
If you run into that issue again, you should be able to tweak the UID# field and try clicking OK again... I suppose you could try that a few times if you have lots of people trying to add a bunch of users at the same time.
-JD.
-JD.
269
Windows Client / Re: Adding new accesses by multiple users
« on: September 29, 2020, 10:16:08 AM »
Seconding ARSXML for batch adding definitions, but that still feels like a bug in the client. Either the UID # needs to be incremented at the time an Admin requests to create a new user, or the UID # needs to be assigned at the time the Admin clicks 'Ok'.
I'd open this as a PMR/SR and report it as a bug.
-JD.
I'd open this as a PMR/SR and report it as a bug.
-JD.
270
Other / Re: CMOD V9.0 Limitation of size of DataBase Field Name on App Group and Folder
« on: September 29, 2020, 10:13:25 AM »
Either way, I think the DB2 limit is 128 characters. Not that I've seen anyone ask, but can we bump it up to match what DB2 permits?
I'll check on the database definition - it might be that this server didn't get a proper upgrade many years ago.
-JD.
I'll check on the database definition - it might be that this server didn't get a proper upgrade many years ago.
-JD.